Skype is ten years out of date

No primary category set

I’ve been thinking over the instant messaging clients I’ve used in the past, most of which I never even log into these days. There was ICQ, Yahoo! Messenger, MSN Messenger, AIM – I had a log on for them all. Sadly due to lack of interoperability between instant messenger clients I consolidated my use down to just one – Skype.

What prompted me to recall my instant messaging past was the news that firewalls are now able to block Skype traffic and prevent users on corporate networks communicating with the outside world. I didn’t have that problem in the old days – I couldn’t even install the software in the first place. Most of the companies I worked for locked users PCs so that they couldn’t download and install applications (It constantly amazes me that companies don’t do the same today!). The inability to install wasn’t a problem because my then favourite Instant Messaging client, Yahoo! Messenger, had a web browser based version.

You can still log onto a web based version of Yahoo! Messenger today. The great advantage for me was I could chat to my friends with no software to install and at the same time feel slightly smug that I’d outwitted the IT department by using unauthorised software. Everything worked including file transfers to and from friends!

The big question is why have Skype been so slow to introduce a browser based version of their software? Why can’t I go to the Skype website from any PC anywhere in the world and simply log on to the service? Why do I have to download and install software? Yahoo! had a browser based solution some ten years or so ago, downloads are so outdated!

2 Responses

  1. Presumably this is because the whole P2P infrastructure of Skype relies on having downloaded clients so that each user can (if needed) act as a node. I think this wouldn’t be possible with a browser-based solution (although I guess they could do this with their messaging service which doesn’t have the same bandwidth constraints).

  2. this is the way that all apps should go imo. google has done it with office and thrillx has done it with casino games. heck even ebay runs this way.

    being less reliant on the (home) user to maintain updates, fixes and the like (and storage of data) has to be an advantage in the main.



Amazon Pay is set to be available at petrol stations, restaurants and stores


Skype adds ‘Send Money’ powered by PayPal to mobile apps


What does the Internet look like?


EU to force Skype to behave more like BT


Windows 10 Anniversary Update breaks web cams

ChannelX Guide...

Featured in this article from the ChannelX Guide – companies that can help you grow and manage your business.


Take a look through a selection of the latest articles on ChannelX

Register for Newsletter

Receive 5 newsletters per week

Gain access to all research

Be notified of upcoming events and webinars