We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "View Preferences" to provide a controlled consent.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
3 Responses
Because their worth it
😈
Lol, North!
eBay does need to police the site better for fakes, but there’s only so much they can do, since they don’t actually have their hands on the product. All of these brands whining about fakes should offer solutions to help differentiate between real goods and fakes instead of going to court. The brands also need to take responsibility for shutting down production of fakes, since the brand is ultimately their responsibility. I think a lot of this is court action is just a backhanded way to keep the brands off of eBay, which these companies feel taints their brand image. They’re probably right about that, but these lawsuits are not the answer.